Most Americans detest Mr. Putin. He`s wanted for crimes committed against the citizens of Syria, and it baffles us why the Russians admire, even idealize him.
Can you imagine any circumstance under which the citizens of Russia could change their opinion from one of un-daunting admiration to that of distaste or even revulsion?
Let us imagine that Russia had three mortal enemies (excluding terrorism).
What would happen in such a scenario, if Putin sold 20% of its Uranium to his most lethal rival at a personal profit of $120,000,000, Classified Secrets on its most advanced Fighter Jets to his most expansive and belligerent enemy, and then sealed a deal with a pariah terrorist state, legitimizing and protecting a prolific production-line of ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads.
Then, adding insult to injury, if Putin co-opted the major News Outlets into disseminating a false narrative that lulled his civilian population into a false complacency that omitted mention about any potential risk?
If such a diabolical plan was exposed, would Putin continue to be as blindly idealized by the citizens of the Motherland?
Would Russian citizens support an environmental plan that not-only penalized business for energy-production, and embarked on a bold “vaccination plan” using D.N.A.-attack Thimerosal to shorten the lives of the elderly, and reduce fertility of prepubescents, in order to achieve “planetary stabilization”, a hypothetical number of 700 million people calculated to “stabilize the planet”.
According to WikiLeaks, Hillary Clinton, with the support of Mr. Obama, has committed all three of the above-mentioned acts of treason.
Both of the Clintons, via back-door channels, sold the plans of our most advanced fighter-jets to China (http://www.infowars.com/former-congressman-clintons-sold-military-secrets-to-china/).
As Secretary of State, (via multiple intermediaries), she brokered the sale of 20% of Americas Uranium to the Russians (http://www.breitbart.com/hillary-clinton/2016/05/01/one-year-silence-hillary-clinton-uranium-deal/)?
She strongly supported the Iran-Nuclear Deal which not only legitimized Iran as a Nuclear Superpower, but whose nuclear production-line remains unverifiable, and its ballistic missile program immune from any restraint.
And rather than shoring-up our borders, she has dismantled them, (admitting openly that she wants them totally open), creating an invasion of unvetted men from the Middle-East, while stifling the opposition by labelling them as Xenophobic racists.
All of this while purposefully keeping us in the dark via a sinister but lucrative collusion with Main-Stream Media including every T.V. channel from B.B.C. to N.S.C.B.C., C.N.N. and the rest to the New York Times and Washington Post. As one commentator remarked, we put the Pravda to shame.
While “running for cover” under attacks of Xenophobia and “hate speech”, Hillary was able to elect senior members of Defense from members of the Egyptian Brotherhood.
In May 2015, former Army Special Services Officer Scott Bennett, revealed that he had irrefutable proof that the Obama administration had been funding ISIS through Swiss bank accounts and were also supplying weapons to the CIA supported group.
How could the American people support Obama’s terrorist policies, especially with regard to ISIS, in light of these revelations? After one reads the remainder of this article, one should consider any terrorist attack upon America by ISIS as also an attack coming from the White House (http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2015/12/07/the-muslim-brotherhood-has-taken-over-the-white-house/).
Department of Homeland Security Deputy Mayor, Arif Alikhan openly participated in a Muslim Public Affairs Council fundraiser titled “Be the Change,” in order to support that organization’s leadership-development programs which openly advocates for the Sharia Law takeover of the United States”.
Mohamed Elibiary is an advisor to the Department of Homeland Security. Out of this list he probably is the most controversial. According to a November 9, CBS News Conference, Elibiary spoke at a Texas conference in 2004 and honored Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini as a “great Islamic visionary.”
Being a member of the Department of Homeland Security’s Advisory Council granted him access to a nationwide database that contained terror watch-lists and sensitive FBI-reports, which he was accused of leaking.
Is anyone surprised that Security Agencies were aware of, yet unable to prevent, many of the terrorist attacks in the U.S. ranging from F. Hood to the Boston Marathon?
Examining the depth, duration, and extent of collusion with and integration with our traditional enemies (and the immunity obtained by their seniority), where can the U.S. begin separating self- from non-self? This is the dilemma of an Immune-System usurped by the Human Aids Virus.
Rather than one cell – line being subsumed by a foreign D.N.A., here we are metaphorically discussing an entire infected community.
Where does this begin or end?
Start by looking at those conducting a personal war with Trump, and willing to do anything for Hillary.
Since this is now all confirmed by WikiLeaks, all the Republican contenders need to carry the message in their unique way: If America is to survive (using a patient-care model), there needs to be a paid media-blitz, simply repeating over and over to a community of comatose patients, that if not awoken from its slumber, Universal Care will pull the plug on them.
Tags: bonding, Caretaker-turned-predator, caretaking, personal agency, political terrorism, Stockholm Syndrome, trauma re-enactment